|
|
|
검색결과 년도: (전체년도), 자료구분: (학술대회 자료), 제목: (모든제목), 저자: (모든저자), 내용: (모든내용)
검색결과에 만족하지 않으십니까? 
|
1. 먼저 표에서 년도에서 찾는 자료의 연도를 선택합니다.
(모든 자료에서 검색하실 경우는 전체로 표시하여 놓습니다.)
2.
구분에서는 원하는 자료를 선택합니다. 예) 한국국정관리학회보, 학술대회자료 등
(모든 자료에서 검색하실 경우는 마찬가지로
전체로 표시하여 놓습니다.)
3. 표에서 제목, 저자 및 초록에서 원하는 부분을 선택하여 입력하신 후 검색을 클릭하시면
됩니다.
(제목, 저자 및 초록에서 원하는 검색어가 없을 경우 모든 자료가 검색 됩니다.
전체제목을 모르시는 경우에
단어만 넣으셔도 검색 가능하며, 최대한 상세정보를 입력하셔야 정확한 검색을 할 수 있습니다.)
* 학술대회자료
만약 학술대회때 발표를 하셨으나 자료실에 없는 것은 저자분이 학회로 제출하지 않은 논문입니다.
|
|
| · 자료구분 |
학술대회 자료 |
|
| · 년도 |
2004년 |
|
| · 자료명 |
2004 동계 - 김재영(인천대) Comparing Public and Private Organizations |
|
| · 저자 |
학회 |
|
| · 첨부파일 |
 2004동계논문(김재영).hwp (파일크기: 0byte, 다운로드 수 : 150)
|
|
| · 내용 |
The distinction between public and private organizations has been an important subject of research in the discipline of public administration. This topic has evolved through debates on the identity of public administration, which began as early as the nineteenth century. In his classic work, W. Wilson wrote that "the field of administration is a field of business(Wilson, 1987, p. 18)," implying that government administration should be equipped with managerial skills and that its primary goal is efficiency. This statement can be regarded an over-simplification now, because, despite the management theorists tendency to trivialize the distinctions between the two sectors, many studies since then identified meaningful differences(Rainey and Chun, 2004).
Nevertheless, the "generic management" premise which prevailed a century ago has not lost its voice. Rather, it has drawn much attention during the past three decades in the midst of government failures marked by its "bigness," inefficiency and growing dissatisfaction of citizens. Both practitioners and academicians of public administration have been challenged since the 1970s by such words as "business-like administration," "entrepreneurship" and "privatization"--all calling for better management in government to enhance efficiency. More recently, the New Public Management movement once again emphasizes reform in the public sector through applications of business management skills, under such names as government reinvention, customer orientation and performance-based government. Therefore, a careful review of cross-sector analyses is still warranted in order to make these reinvention efforts productive and to prepare public administrators for ongoing environmental change. In addition, from a theoretical perspective, we can develop theories of management science or organizational behaviors through this type of research(Rainey and Chun, 2004).
Unlike the United States, where research on this subject has been plentiful, comparison of the two sectors has not received proper attention in this country. Although individual studies were attempted occasionally, they were not conducted in a systematic manner. Nor have we accumulated a significant body of knowledge concerning the differences between the two sectors. Yet, it is a good sign of change that several empirical studies have been conducted during the last decade, indicating a growing interest in this subject. In this paper, we review literature comparing public and private organizations in the United States and Korea and pose some propositions for future research.
(위 논문의 introduction을 전재함)
[이 게시물은 관리자님에 의해 2009-07-16 13:50:23 11에서 이동 됨] |
|
 
|
|
|
현대사회와 행정 ISSN 1229-389X (Print), ISSN 2713-6302 (Online)
|
  |
등록자료 113건
|
|
|
|
